If it can be chained then it seems a waste to sort early. 

Don

On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:07 PM, Jeremy Evans wrote:

> On Mar 17, 7:36 pm, rohit <[email protected]> wrote:
>> With group_and_count I usually want ordering by count descending. Is
>> it easy to support asc, desc, and none?
> 
> I'm thinking of changing it so that group_and_count does not modify
> the dataset's order.  Currently, it sets the order to count
> descending, which is a common desire, but not an exclusive one.  Since
> group_and_count returns a modified dataset, it's easy to chain it with
> order:
> 
>  dataset.group_and_count(:column).order(:count.desc)
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sequel-talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to