How will your proposed strict_modification? flag handle concurrent non-transactional row changes like this:
Process A loads an instance of Foo from the database Process B updates the table row the Foo instance refers to changing field bar from value "oldbar" to value "newbar" but process A doesn't know about this update. Process A executes an UPDATE to the Foo instance, changing the value from "oldbar" to "newbar". Process A's update sees that ZERO rows were changed (because a different process already updated the value to the new value). Will Process A raise an exception in this case,even though the value of the Foo object has the expected new value? Wondering, Aaron out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
