On May 4, 1:29 pm, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > You want select_append instead of select_more.
Just-in-time features from 3.11, eh? :) Thanks. It feels a little odd to me that the implicit "selecting none is the same as selecting all" gets equated to "selecting all is the same as selecting none" in the case of select_more. Has select_append been added just to work around some code that treats '*' as an empty selection, even when select_all has been requested? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
