On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:01 , Jeremy Evans wrote:
>> >> c.batch_id="375a4e3c-5fc1-11df-94f7-00065b3f562c"
>> => "375a4e3c-5fc1-11df-94f7-00065b3f562c"
>> >> c.valid?
>> => true
>>
>> What? But .percentage isn't even defined yet . . .
>> I cannot figure out why the validation system is correctly monitoring the
>> two _id parameters, but completely ignoring the percentage.
>
> I can't replicate this:
And well you shouldn't. I apologize for being a dummkopf and wasting your time.
It seems, a few weeks ago, I'd been perplexed by getting back this 'BigDecimal"
type which kept formatting in an exasperatingly useless way, so I'd added
def percentage
super.to_f
end
to the definition of the Component model. I'm not sure if that code even
accomplished anything, but it certainly messed up the validation code.
Removing it has solved the problem.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
