On Dec 1, 1:56 pm, Gary Doades <[email protected]> wrote: > So it seems that I MUST add a valid :read_only entry to the servers hash > or bizarre behaviour ensues.
That's misleading. You only need to add a valid :read_only entry to servers if you are also overriding the :servers_hash option. If you don't override the :servers_hash option, then you don't need a read_only entry in the servers hash. > This may or not be the intended behaviour. > If so it needs documenting I think. It is the intended behavior. It's how the master/slave database support works without any configuration other than setting up the database connection. If you think it should be documented somewhere, I'll certainly consider a patch. Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
