I think I presumed that was the case because of my experience trying to do it with symbols. I just read the Rdoc on virtual rows (which, incidentally, are really cool) and it makes sense now.
Thanks again. On Feb 8, 7:31 am, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 7:36 pm, cult hero <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know some conventions that worked in Ruby 1.8 do not work in Ruby > > 1.9, most notably something like this: > > > check{num > 5} > > > How would I accomplish this in a migration 1.9? I know how I'd do it > > in a filter method, but not in a check. > > That appears to work for me. > on a symbol won't work, but it still > works in a virtual row block. In fact, one of the main reasons for > virtual row blocks is that they work on both ruby 1.8 and ruby 1.9. > > Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
