Thank you all. I may opt for AR and then Sequel and share my experiences. -Kedar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Michael Granger <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2/26/11 3:44 PM, Max Schubert wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Michael Granger <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Also, once you've used Sequel, it's extremely frustrating to try to use > >> AR for anything other than a simple objectstore. > > > > Our current project we are putting a toe back into RoR - with Rails 3 > > ActiveRecord is *much* more flexible and more Sequel-like - really > > enjoying it - so if your statement above is about Rails 2.x and before > > I'd agree whole-heartedly - I'd disagree for Rails 3. > > Yes, the last time I used AR was for a Rails 2.x project, so it's good > to know it's improved. It seems to have borrowed several big ideas from > Sequel or something else similar, which can only be a good thing. > > -- > Michael Granger <[email protected]> > http://deveiate.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sequel-talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
