Jeremy, While I'm all for this fix, especially since I can't think of any issues with to_i() and to_f() (I might just not know about them), I think it's a good idea to provide an extension that makes the code backwards compatible just like you said. This would give people the time to either update their code or realize newer versions of Sequel just aren't going to work for certain applications (sometimes updating legacy code just isn't going to work). Just out of curiosity, what was your initial motivation for going with Kernel#Integer and Kernel#Float rather than using to_f() and to_i()?
Yorick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sequel-talk/-/rfFgGxsO9McJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
