On Aug 16, 9:03 am, Jason Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Jeremy. I will work on that. Should I extend the > ThreadedConnectionPool or create a brand new implementation?
Subclassing that for your implementation would probably be easiest. Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
