Jeremy Evans wrote:
On Sep 16, 6:03 pm, Michael Granger<[email protected]> wrote:
According to my experiments, abandoning the COPY in the middle doesn't
have any adverse effects. Example script and the output from running it
(with trace output):http://pastie.org/2545817
That's definitely a positive sign. What happens if another copy
command is used before all previous copy results have been retrieved?
If it ignores the previous results, then it should be safe, and I just
need to write the specs before committing it.
It ignores the previous results. I tried both the exact same query
again, which correctly started the results over, and changing the COPY
to 'WITH ( FORMAT text )' instead, which did the same.
--
Michael Granger <[email protected]>
http://deveiate.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
