On Jan 19, 7:45 am, dhs227 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > > Is it possible or reasonable that Sequel developer will consider > add convenient function to this case? "untitled1", "untitled2", and so on. > That looks reasonable if the return result contains more than one "unnamed" > columns. Agree or not.
Disagree. It doesn't fix the issue. You still don't know which entry in the hash corresponds to which column. The correct solution is to use column aliases. Doing as you suggest would encourage people to not use column aliases, which is a bad idea IMO. Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
