On Feb 27, 11:03 am, Myron Marston <[email protected]> wrote: > Keeping these de-coupled sounds like the right approach. That said, > it seems kinda funny to have the recommended API for this use case be > "define a singleton method like so". Might it be worth defining an > extension that simply enables both the with_server and > arbitrary_servers extensions, and then defines the `with_server` > method as you've shown above? That way the individual extensions stay > de-coupled but the recommended way to combine them is clear.
I'll consider doing this in the future if a number of Sequel users request it. Currently, I think doing so is a bit premature. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
