On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 12:29:57 AM UTC-8, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> fantastic! now that hstore is a proper extension in 9.1, i'd love to
> revisit the work i did on that and get it merged in. i'll try and make
> some time on thursday to talk.
>
That's actually next on my list after I finish up the array support. :)
Let's talk tomorrow and get the details worked out. When I looked over
sequel-hstore last night, there were just a few significant changes I was
considering:
* Hash keys should be strings, not symbols
* HStore should be a DelegateClass of Hash, not a subclass
* Make Hstore#[]= convert input key and value to strings before storing
* Consider using the default proc of {|h,k| h[k.to_s]} for the hash so that
you can access values with symbols even though they are stored as strings
* Refactor the parsing somewhat
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sequel-talk" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sequel-talk/-/navmn9Ju5RkJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
