Thanks alot but that wasn't the answer I was looking for with my question
as I had changed my original sql query to be more specific.
Disregard my previous messages. Here's the completely new question.

I've improved my sql to

@groups = Group.where().group(:groups__id).left_join(:posts, :group_id=>:id)
>

.order(Sequel.desc(:groups__id))

.select(:groups__id, :groups__user_id, :groups__title)
>

What I would like to do, is order the groups on my website, based on
the *recent
activity* within those groups.
Right now *(in the query above)* the groups are ordered by their id column
in descending order.
I would like to improve this, by *also *ordering them by the latest post
made inside them, also sorted by a descending id column.

Here's what I tried to use that didn't work.

@groups = Group.where().group(:groups__id).left_join(:posts, :group_id=>:id)
>

.order(Sequel.desc(:groups__id))*.order_prepend{max(posts__datenumber)***

.select(:groups__id, :groups__user_id, :groups__title)
>

So far, that hasn't changed anything.
I created a row in the posts table, with the value of 1 for the group_id
column, and it hasn't done anything.
I would like to be matched up to the group's id of 1, and be used for
sorting those groups.

Could you please help?

On 21 October 2012 17:08, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:36:58 AM UTC-7, desbest wrote:
>
>> For the first error, I would like to say that the posts.datenumber and
>> groups.datenumber column *does* exist. I probably should have made that
>> clear,
>> I've added the schema now. 
>> https://gist.github.com/**3925058<https://gist.github.com/3925058>
>> When I use the virtual row, it started working to do what I wanted it to
>> do. Thank you. It was a query to order groups based on recent activity,
>> excluding comment replies.
>>
>> This leads me to my 2nd question.
>>
>> How can I modify the first query that originally worked, so that
>> inbetween .order{max(posts__datenumber) and 
>> .order_append(:groups__**datenumber),
>> that posts with a pond with more than zero 0, be excluded from the ordering
>> of the rows, or that the groups with a post above zero, gets lower
>> presedence in sorting?
>>
>
> You are joining to a subselect, which requires using an alias (Sequel
> creates uses a default alias if you don't specify one), you probably want
> "join(Post.where{floor > 0}.as(:posts), :group_id=>:id)".  The current code
> fails because in the query, posts.datenumber is not valid.  Also, you
> should probably remove the ".exclude()".
>
> Note that you can call the sql method on any dataset to see the SQL it
> would generate, which would make it more obvious why SQLite didn't like
> your SQL.
>
> Jeremy
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sequel-talk" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sequel-talk/-/IPmxY5Y5_YoJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.

Reply via email to