makes sense, and I would have personally much rather taken the full Sequel DSL approach but the powers at be ruled me out
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 1:32:49 PM UTC-7, Charles Monteiro wrote: >> >> yeah I had tried that but it won't work if I'm using raw sql ( makes >> sense) e.g. DB['select * from my_table'], we are finishing a Oracle stored >> proc converter i.e. auto converter (somewhat specific to our stored procs >> :) ) . to enable that the decision was made that the sql strings would be >> kept intact. There are some exceptions such as "select ..into" , point >> being I'm dealing with raw sql >> >> so I'll have to parse the sql which is fine, just checking if I had >> missed something >> > > One of Sequel's guiding principles is that it never attempts to parse SQL, > so if you specify raw SQL for a dataset, Sequel will never be able to break > down the dataset into separate clauses. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sequel-talk/geax8DY0-uI/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Charles A. Monteiro www.monteirosfusion.com sent from the road -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
