Most gems designed to run in Rails presume AR is in place.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm curious. What great gems are missing Sequel support besides Rails > Admin? > Em 11/07/2014 18:20, "Tim Uckun" <[email protected]> escreveu: > >> People use AR because all of the gems they use depend on it. >> On 12/07/2014 3:02 AM, "Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Well, we're increasing the number of deploy environments as well ;) >>> >>> Jokes aside, congrats! Sequel is really awesome and I actually find it >>> surprising that AR is so much more popular just because it's Rails' >>> default. After all, RSpec is not Rails default and seems to always have >>> been more popular. And jQuery has been more popular even before it was the >>> default JS library bundled with Rails... >>> >>> I really don't understand why people have been strugling with AR for so >>> much time when we have a clearly much better option available. >>> >>> Keep up with the great work you've put in Sequel! >>> >>> In the other hand, when Ruby and Rails were all niche software it was >>> usual to find more smart people among Rubists, which is also the case (my >>> opinion of course) in the Sequel community overall. If Sequel community >>> grows too much it will become harder to find the smart ones among the >>> user's base ;) I know I'm not supposed to publicly state such kind of >>> opinions, but I couldn't resist :P >>> >>> Also, it would be harder to get your attention if you had to handle the >>> demand of 10 or 100 times more users in the mailing list ;) >>> >>> Em segunda-feira, 21 de abril de 2014 15h03min17s UTC-3, Jeremy Evans >>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> It took Sequel over 6 years to get the first million gem downloads, and >>>> only 14 months to get the second million. I think this shows that Sequel >>>> usage has been significantly accelerating this past year. If this trend >>>> continues, we may even hit 3 million by the end of the year! >>>> >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "sequel-talk" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sequel-talk/tPO5ZpLsONg/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sequel-talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
