Nice work, Jeremy! I personally like minitest/spec better for the same 
reasons you gave, I think this will be a nice improvement to the lib.

On Friday, May 8, 2015 at 12:02:17 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>
> Sequel has been using RSpec since before I was maintainer.   Over the 
> years, I've added support for newer versions of RSpec, but Sequel has 
> always run correctly with RSpec 1.3, and I haven't found newer RSpec 
> features added much value for me.
>
> After learning more about minitest/spec, I found it fit my testing 
> philosophy better, and after reading most of the code, I've found it simple 
> and easy to extend.  After switching all of the other libraries and 
> applications I maintain to minitest/spec, I've spent the last few days 
> switching Sequel over to it as well.
>
> This was not just a simple syntax replacement.  minitest randomizes test 
> output by default, which exposed a large number of test order dependency 
> bugs in Sequel's specs, which I had to fix.  In most cases, I could 
> determine the fix fairly easily based on the error, but in some cases I 
> used minitest_bisect to bisect the error and give me a minimal 
> reproduction, which made it easy to fix.To be fair, the next version of 
> RSpec will have support for bisecting built in, and I RSpec has supported 
> randomized tests since 2.8.0, though it is still not the default. 
>
> After switching to minitest/spec, in addition to being higher quality due 
> to the randomized order, the specs also run a bit faster, which is a nice 
> bonus.
>
> I did have to create a couple minitest extensions to add features to 
> minitest that it doesn't support natively (mintiest-hooks for before/after 
> :all hooks, minitest-shared_description for shared spec subclasses), but I 
> had a very easy time developing them.  You now only have to install 3 gems 
> to test Sequel, as opposed to the 6 pulled in by rspec, and the gems are 
> smaller (84KB vs 338KB).
>
> As this is just a changing of the spec library, this will not have an 
> effect on Sequel users.  However, it should make it easier to contribute to 
> Sequel, since you will no longer need to make sure specs pass on multiple 
> versions of RSpec.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to