On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 3:13:41 PM UTC-7, John Backus wrote:
>
> I'm upgrade to Sequel 4.48 and I'm getting deprecation warnings for 
> `register_row_type`. Currently I have this type:
>
> cognito-dev=# \dT+ encrypted_ssn
>                                           List of data types
>  Schema |     Name      | Internal name | Size  | Elements |  Owner  | 
> Access privileges | Description
>
> --------+---------------+---------------+-------+----------+---------+-------------------+-------------
>  public | encrypted_ssn | encrypted_ssn | tuple |          | cognito |   
>                 |
> (1 row)
>
> CREATE TYPE encrypted_ssn AS (
>  ciphertext encrypted_ssn_ciphertext,
>  metadata encryption_metadata
> );
>
> right now I just do this with Sequel:
>
> DB.register_row_type(:encrypted_ssn)
>
> I guess this is deprecated now but I'm not clear on how to resolve it 
> based on the warning:
>
> SEQUEL DEPRECATION WARNING: Calling conversion proc for subtype (oid: 
> 338050) of composite type (oid: 338058) not added until after composite 
> type registration is deprecated and will be removed in Sequel 5.  Register 
> subtype conversion procs before registering composite type.
>
> Do I need to query the pg_type table like Sequel does? I'm not clear on 
> what I'm supposed to register, with what public API, etc.
>

You probably want to run:

DB.add_named_conversion_proc(:encrypted_ssn_ciphertext){|s| ...} 
DB.add_named_conversion_proc(:encryption_metadata){|s| ...} 
DB.register_row_type(:encrypted_ssn)

The deprecation warning should only happen if you were adding the 
conversion proc for encrypted_ssn_ciphertext or encryption_metadata after 
registering the row type.  I'm guessing your current code does something 
like:

DB.register_row_type(:encrypted_ssn)
DB.add_named_conversion_proc(:encrypted_ssn_ciphertext){|s| ...} 
DB.add_named_conversion_proc(:encryption_metadata){|s| ...} 

If that isn't the case and you are sure that the subtype row procs are 
already registered when register_row_type is called, or that you weren't 
registering conversion procs for the subtypes, I would appreciate if you 
could submit a minimal self contained example showing the problem so that I 
could debug it.

Thanks,
Jeremy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to