On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 8:29:55 PM UTC-8, shashank Jain wrote: > > Right. We understand that removing sync will make code non thread safe, > but just wanted to check if it improves anything. > So even after removing all sync blocks in hold method as well , the > timings are not improving. > Also we observe that even if max connection pool size is set to 400 the > max connections it creates to DB is almost half the number. Struggling to > figure out where really the issue is now. > Thanks > Shashank >
Did you try using JRuby, as I've already mentioned multiple times earlier in this thread? If performance is significantly better with JRuby, you can probably assume this is a CRuby issue. CRuby in general does not handle large numbers of threads well, especially if the workload is not mostly IO bound. Threads in general are not executed in parallel in CRuby due to the GVL, and with 300 threads you can probably see how that can present issues. If you aren't willing to try JRuby, I won't be willing to provide further assistance troubleshooting this issue. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
