On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 7:43:19 AM UTC-8, Андрей Аладьев wrote: > > I don't know whether we could use ":class" option. Maybe we can add a new > option like ":associated_class" in order to patch "associated_class" > method. >
You are specifically setting the associated class for the association, so the :class option is the appropriate one. AssociationReflection#associated_class will use the :class option you specify, and only fallback to constantizing the :class_name option if the :class option is not set. I don't see how adding an :associated_class option would help, since it would do the same thing that the :class option currently does. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.