Hi everybody. Look at this code:
class Foo < Sequel::Model one_to_many :bars end class Bar < Sequel::Model many_to_one :foo end f = Foo.new b = Bar.new b.foo = f f.bars # => [] f2 = Foo.new b2 = Bar.new f.bars # Magic line! b2.foo = f2 f2.bars # => [b2] I think first case should return same that second case. We continue with the example: f2.save # Foo object with id 1 and a bar child b3 = Bar.new(foo_id: 1) f3 = b3.foo f3.bars # => [f2] In this case, I think it should return [f2, f3] Do you see these requirements logical? If we have reciprocal and object assignation, I think these are two annoying Sequel effects that go against "least surprise" principle. Greets. -- David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sequel-talk@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
