On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 12:42:42 PM UTC-7, Janko Marohnić wrote: > > Wow, the COUNT approach is *really* inefficient compared to the IN > subquery, it totally makes sense never to use it :P > > Would you perhaps be open to adding a `Sequel::Model.association_dataset` > method some time in the future that would retrieve the > `eager_loading_dataset` (called with `.association_dataset(:association)`)? > I think it would be nice alternative, as it would allow one to avoid > duplicating any conditions and ordering configured for the association. >
I'm not sure. I would have to think about it. There is the dataset_associations plugin, which is designed to provide association methods on class's dataset that return a dataset of associated objects. That's probably going to more usable for most people, though it could be less efficient. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
