Thank you, I was assumed that was your stance on it in general, but wanted to ask. Thanks for the great tip! I'm going to add that as an alias.
On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 11:58:15 AM UTC-6, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 9:47:51 AM UTC-8, Jeremy Evans wrote: >> >> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 9:33:52 AM UTC-8, Tim Tilberg wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jeremy, would you be open to a way to configure Pry as a default >>> `sequel` shell? I don't know what the best way to accomplish that would be, >>> but in my copies of the gem, I usually replace IRB with Pry in >>> `bin/sequel`. I was thinking either a configuration file somewhere, or env >>> var, or just by default trying to use Pry if you have it installed. >>> >>> I didn't see this discussed anywhere yet in a quick search, and was >>> wondering about your thoughts? >>> >> >> I will consider this when pry ships with ruby and not before. >> > > Note that you can already use pry with bin/sequel easily without > modification: > > sequel postgres://... -r pry -c binding.pry > > Thanks, > Jeremy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
