Alexander:
I just started using Sequoia, so don't take my words
as those of someone with experience.
I think two machines, each running a controller and a
backend is a very good configuration to start.
I am attempting to do that, except I want to have
the two machines in geographically separated data
centers and connections between them tunneled using
SSL.
I am having trouble with the group communication
(The SSL tunnels are confusing it), but there are
brief periods when things work fine and it seems
to be good during those times.
If you put the two machines in the same subnet,
everything should work fine and it will give
you redundancy.
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (214)986-3533, www.JAMMConsulting.com
FREE! Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox.
Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander
Wallace
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Sequoia general mailing list
Subject: [Sequoia] is 2 collocated controllers w/1 backend each adviseable?
Hi all.. A small request for advise.
I have 2 database servers, currently in a master/slave replication mode...
Would it work, is it advisable at all, to convert this into 2 collocated
controllers with 1 db/back end each? The goal is to reuse existing
hardware in a way that gives us failover for controllers and load
balancing of 2 db servers... Instead of 6 servers (2 controllers and 2
db servers each), to start with.
Thanks to all for your comments...
_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
