Emmanuel Cecchet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we allow the recovery log to be an optional element, that forces us > to clutter the code with 'if (recoveryLog!=null)' all over the > places. This often leads to NPE in the cases we missed
The natural and safe solution to this kind of issue is to implement a fake recovery log. Niraj do you think you could contribute this? > not having a recovery log does not allow to add new nodes or > recovery from failures (which is really what Sequoia has been > designed for). Wasn't it also designed for load-balancing? Raidb0 does not look like it is able to recover from failures, does it? _______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list Sequoia@lists.forge.continuent.org https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
