Hi all,
We use sequoia with oracle sgbd, 2 applications are linked to sequoia, one uses TABLES and the other uses VIEWS, some of this views are bidirectional (UPDATE statements are available) we succeed in starting controllers, requesting tables and views configuring a static shema for the backend with a <DatabaseTable> markup for each table or view of our schema. In an another hand i have seen Raidb1 level implies a table parsing. Though the explanation his duplication needs to acquire locks on table when updates are requested... 1) Is this interpretation correct ? 2) Do we risk some database inconsistency with this configuration ? (If first answer is yes, i'm afraid the second answer is yes too :( ) 3) If this configuration is risky, what other choice do we have ? Thanks in advance, Pierre Besson-Deblon This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, may be accessed by someone other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons. This access is controlled under Regulation of security reasons. This access is controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business Practises. _______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
