Hi, Christopher, > but what is weird is when we then rerun the client, > the client would be able to insert records on both > nodes! > Thats the same ugly behavior i detected and reported one month ago[1]. I filed a bug for this [2].
There is no split-brain scenario in sequoia using jgroups/appia/spread. Thats why you saw this behavior, when the crashed controller returns he accepts inserts. Even if he shouldn't accept them cause is database is not in sync. > when i issue the "show controllers" command, it only > shows the local controller for each machine. > for example in node2: > vdb(admin) > show controllers > vdb is hosted by 1 controller(s): > 192.168.5.112:1090 > The reason why we see only one controller is another bug i filed [3]. But unfortunately nobody takes care about those bugs, cause the company which runs this open-source project sells an enhanced version with self-developed group-communication. In which these bugs do not occur. I don't say thats bad, but it is not good, that there is no community left that cares about the bugs with OpenSource group-communications. Stefan [1] https://forge.continuent.org/pipermail/sequoia/2007-September/005630.html [2] https://forge.continuent.org/jira/browse/SEQUOIA-980 [3] https://forge.continuent.org/jira/browse/SEQUOIA-983
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
