Hello Robert/All,
First off, thanks for supplying the test tools. Now, I ran the evaluator on similar setup as in the presentation (PG_Portland-2007-10-Middleware.pdf). That is RAIDb-1 setup, 2 controllers (Sequoia 2.10) and 2 backends (PostgreSQL 8.2.5). The hardware is quite similar too. The results are quite dissimilar however. I find that the direct database access is much faster, about 30%, than the Sequoia based access. I can post the evaluator result files, if required. So does anyone have any explanation? Is there some “tuning” that needs to be done? Thanks and Regards, Sharib Anis From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Hodges Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sequoia general mailing list; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Sequoia] Announcing Bristlecone Test Tools Hi everyone, I sent out a somewhat informal announcement of the Bristlecone Test Tools on the Sequoia mailing list about a month ago. Here's an official press release from Continuent. We hope you will have a look at these tools for your performance testing. We will continue to improve them over time. One particular project is to add TCP-B support with help from the GORDA folks. For more information, check out the Bristlecone web pages. Also, if you have other favorite testing tools please post to the Bristlecone list. I'm looking for a solid tool for distributed testing Grinder looks pretty nice. Cheers, Robert Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm
_______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
