Hi all, We're trying to set up Sequoia and, with one controller with two replicating backends, things work as described. We would like to have some redundancy at the controller level as well, but we would like to keep things simple (in the sense of not using more backends than necessary), at the same time. Is it possible to have an additional controller (to simply help out in the controlling function) for the virtual DB without defining any backends for it? From reading the docs, it seems that the controllers must have different backends, but I take it that they must be defined.
If the above is not possible, would it make sense to have one backend per each (of two) controller? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment, Adrian
_______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
