No worries Robert, this is a DEBUG message already.

manu

Robert Hodges wrote:
Hi Adam,

Depending what you are trying to do 2.10 does in fact support basic semantic information. I need to lok into why you are seeing this error message—we should be able to reduce that at least to warning.

The 4.0 version will be a lot better.

Thanks, Robert


On 6/27/08 1:17 PM, "Adam Purkiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    Ah i see, that is a shame.


    Like I said I am just getting into Sequoia, but I understand 2
    does not support stored procedures and we have some right now and
    will I assume need to look into removing, so thats one thing. I
    still need to sit down and read up more on this stuff so not sure
    what else was is in the works for 3/4. Is there a nice roadmap I
    have not spotted?




    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:02:58 +0200
    > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: Re: [Sequoia] Failed to get stored procedure semantics
    from database backend (Table XXX.sequoiasabas
    >
    > Adam Purkiss wrote:
    > > ok, thanks. I was getting worried.
    > >
    > > BTW what is the ETA of 4. I understand there is a lot of things
    meant
    > > for it that we could really do with - I have just taken over
    looking
    > > into Sequoia so trying to play catch up fast, lol.
    > There is no ETA set yet for Sequoia 4. Right now I am the only one
    > working on it and I do that mostly on my free time.
    > Besides I am in the process of moving to the US so I don't have
    as much
    > time as I'd like to get this moving. Also Continuent was supposed to
    > open source the test suite in May but nothing happened so far so
    it's
    > too early to say when a first usable release of Sequoia 4 will be
    > available. Also the Tungsten stack seems to spread much more
    broadly to
    > master-slave configurations which require a lot of extra work. So I
    > don't know how much contributions on Sequoia 4 will come from
    > Continuent's side.
    >
    > What are the most interesting for you in Sequoia 4?
    >
    > Thanks for your feedback,
    > Emmanuel


--
Emmanuel Cecchet
FTO @ Frog Thinker Open Source Development & Consulting
--
Web: http://www.frogthinker.org
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: emmanuel_cecchet

_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia

Reply via email to