rt.com
<https://www.rt.com/op-edge/333456-nato-sprawl-aggravating-serbian-spring/>



Is NATO sprawl aggravating a 'Serbian Spring'?


A symbolic treaty between NATO and the Serbian government has spurred mass
demonstrations and calls for an alliance with Russia. With pending elections
offering a choice between bad and worse, the frustrated populace is
channeling the spirit of 1941. 

Last week, the Serbian parliament voted overwhelmingly to ratify a treaty
with NATO's Support and Procurement Organization (NSPO). President Tomislav
Nikolic signed it into law on Friday. On Saturday, thousands of protesters
marched through the capital, shouting slogans against NATO and calling on
Russia for help.

Some have even compared the treaty with NATO to the old Kingdom of
Yugoslavia entering the Tripartite Pact in March 1941; back then, a popular
revolt against the Pact triggered a long-planned military coup and enraged
Hitler to the point where he delayed the attack on the Soviet Union to "wipe
Yugoslavia off the map."

What gives? According to Serbian military experts, the agreement merely
creates "logistical interoperability" between Serbia and the alliance. It is
the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), signed by the previous government and
ratified by this one last March, that actually allows NATO personnel free
passage across Serbia and immunity from taxes, fees and prosecution. Yet the
NSPO deal may be the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.

Read more

Serbian outrage stems from being under NATO's heel over the past two
decades, from the alliance's intervention in the Yugoslav wars, to the
bombing of Serbia in 1999 and the subsequent occupation of its province of
Kosovo. NATO powers have been at the forefront of demanding Serbia recognize
Kosovo's "independence," declared in 2008.

"Our policy is clear," Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic argued,
"Serbia is an independent, sovereign state that wishes to cooperate with
both the Russian Federation and NATO."

The response of most Serbians to this is, frankly, unprintable. First
elected on a platform of patriotism, the increasingly unpopular Vucic has
spearheaded a policy of capitulating to the endless demands from the EU, US
and NATO, while tempering it with symbolic gestures of friendship towards
Russia. Opportunities for Serbia to profit from its neutrality by trading
with Russia usually get ruined by the government's sanctioning of fraud and
dirty tricks - such as labeling EU apples as Serbian to duck the
agricultural sanctions.

Read more

Even if Vucic is some sort of genius statesman, balancing Serbia
precariously between Moscow and Washington - as some cautious columnists
have argued - after four years of this kind of behavior, the general public
simply does not believe it any more.

Vucic himself has a habit of praising the "Protestant work ethic" and
telling the Serbs to "be more like Germans." It does not help that his
"reformation" from a Radical to a Progressive - literally, as those were the
names of his parties - was midwifed by the US, and that he is widely
perceived as but the latest in a long line of stooges at the helm of Serbia,
ever since the October 2000 coup that served as the template for all "color
revolutions" thereafter.

In the upcoming general election in April, Serbians will have a choice
between Vucic and those who think he is not capitulating to NATO fast
enough. The few parties that oppose the country's slow digestion by the
NATO-EU Leviathan could not even get into parliament. They have alleged
voter fraud, but even if there was none, almost all the media in the country
are owned by pro-NATO interests, and blast their messages accordingly.

Read more

 

One of the more cynical arguments in favor of the latest pact is that Serbia
"needs NATO to protect the Serbs" in Kosovo. Critics swiftly countered that
it was NATO who delivered the province to the terrorist KLA, causing the
exodus of a quarter of a million non-Albanians; it was NATO who failed to
protect Serb villages, churches, and cemeteries, desecrated or dynamited or
torched by the hundreds since 1999; and it was NATO that for three days in
March 2004 failed to stop the 50,000-strong mob from rampaging across the
province. Were it not for NATO, the residents of Kosovo would not need
'protecting' from the KLA to begin with.

Allying with Russia would make Serbia a target, NATO partisans argue, adding
that the country needs to join NATO to avoid another 1999. "We're either at
the table, or on the menu," says Vuk Draskovic, once considered a
nationalist and now a fervent member of the NATO cult.

Many Serbs point out the same reasoning was used by the government that
tried to capitulate to Hitler in 1941. "We were never a Russian client, yet
we've been in NATO's sights for over two decades now," wrote one dissident
blogger. "I can't see how it could get any worse."

Friday's killing of two Serbian diplomats - held as hostages by Islamic
State terrorists in Libya - by US bombs only underscores this insane logic
of insisting that one's tormentor is really a benefactor, which the Russian
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman rightly compared
<https://www.rt.com/news/333082-us-raid-libya-serbians-killed/>  to the
"Stockholm syndrome."

So, Saturday's protest was not about a minor administrative treaty, but
about a decades-long train of lies and abuses. It was a cry for help from a
people who believed the seductive lie that the 1990s were their fault and
that NATO, EU and "liberal democracy" would fix everything, only to realize
that everything they touched turned to ash. These people have watched with
horror as the West used Serbia's surrender to justify the invasions of Iraq
and Libya and support fanatics in Syria and Ukraine. But the latter two
examples also showed them that resistance is not futile - not anymore.

Nebojsa Malic, for RT

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"serbia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/serbia.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to