foreignpolicyjournal.com
<http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/07/15/the-european-union-moral-hyp
ocrisy-and-stroking-tension-in-the-balkans/>  


The European Union, Moral Hypocrisy, and Stroking Tension in the Balkans |
Foreign Policy Journal


More articles by this author >

Flags of Croatia and the European Union at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and European Integration building in Zagreb (Bogdan Giuşcă
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Croatia_EU_flags.jpg> /CC BY-SA 3.0
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en> )

Over the past several years, analysts and commentators have noticed
<http://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/pro-nazi-nostalgia-flourishe
s-under-new-croatia-government/>  a rising tide of domestic support for the
Croatian homegrown Nazi movement of the Second World War, the Ustashe, which
actively exterminated Serbs, Jews, and Roma in the territory it controlled
from 1941-45. Far from condemning this alarming development, the Croatian
government, the European Union, and non-state actors within it have tacitly
and actively supported the rising tide of sympathy towards the Ustashe.

This disconnect between the ostensible "European values" of human rights and
tolerance that the European Union claims to represent and its tacit support
of trends towards extremist politics in Croatia will have a significant
impact on the increasing trend of Euroscepticism
<http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbian-citizen-s-biggest-eu-scepti
cs-in-the-region-08-06-2015>  in Serbia and other Balkan states.
Furthermore, the Union's unabashed condemnation of legitimate populist
movements in Europe, including but not limited to the Brexit campaign, as
"racist" and "xenophobic," while quietly supporting genuinely extremist
political elements will contribute to the increasingly popular perception of
the EU as a morally bankrupt and hypocritical
<https://pjmedia.com/blog/the-hypocritical-elites-deserved-brexit/> entity.


Surge in Ustasha Sympathy


The Republic of Croatia has, since its independence, often reverted to the
imagery of its Second World War predecessor; the Independent State of
Croatia (NDH). The NDH was a puppet state sponsored by Nazi Germany and
Fascist Italy, and was administered by the Ustashe. During its brief
four-year lifespan, the NDH made use of a form of clerical fascism built on
the basis of discrimination and systematized liquidation of non-Croatian
elements within its boundaries. It was responsible for the deaths
<https://books.google.ca/books?id=hpVo-cu8wNUC&pg=PA124&redir_esc=y#v=onepag
e&q&f=false>  of anywhere between 300,000 to 600,000 Serbs and tens of
thousands of Jews and Roma.

While restricted by law, Ustashe symbolism is freely exhibited at sporting
events, political rallies, and all manners of public gatherings. The
penalties for these displays are often restricted to a small monetary fine.
By comparison, German law (Strafgesetzbuch section 86a) stipulates
<http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/StGB.htm#86a>  that a fine and/or a
sentence of up to three years imprisonment will be administered.

Ustasha support among football hooligans (including a recent event
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/croatia-election-swastika-on
-pitch-during-euro-2016-qualifier-with-italy-is-symbolic-of-the-rise-of-1034
0358.html> during Euro 2016 where Croatian fans openly brandished swastikas)
has been popular for decades; a more alarming trend is the active and tacit
support of the Ustashe movement and legacy coming from the Croatian
government. Earlier this year, the government of Croatia was condemned for
appointing
<http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2016&mm=02&dd=03&nav_id=96918>
Zlatko Hasanbegovic, a prominent and open admirer of the Ustashe regime to
be the country's minister of culture. Croatia's president, Kolinda
Grabar-Kitarovic, is an avid fan
<http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2016&mm=06&dd=10&nav_id=98285>
of the pro-Ustashe musician Marko Perkovic "Thompson" and, while describing
the Ustashe regime as "criminal", also stated
<http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/kolinda-grabar-kitarovic-ndh-je-bil
a-najmanje-nezavisna-i-najmanje-je-stitila-interese-hrvata-a-ustaski-rezim-b
io-je-zlocinacki/3709554/>  in the past that the NDH "at least protect[ed]
the interests of the Croatian people" during its short and incredibly
violent reign.


Silence at Best, Encouragement at Worst


Despite ongoing reports
<https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/croatia/report
-croatia/>  by international NGO's of state-sponsored discrimination against
Croatian Serbs and routine desecrations
<http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2016&mm=07&dd=06&nav_id=98544>
of Serbian churches and cultural monuments at the hands of pro-Ustashe
elements in the country, the European Union has remained almost completely
silent on the issue of growing pro-Ustashe sympathies in the Croatian
government and political scene.

Rather than condemn the rising tide of Ustashe sympathy in the country or
denounce the appointment of Ustashe sympathizers to some of the Croatian
government's highest ministries, the European Union has chosen to tacitly
support the creeping return of political extremism to Croatia. On June 15,
an exhibition dedicated to Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac was held at the
European Parliament, one of the EU's most important institutions of
governance. Cardinal Stepinac, who served as the Croatian Catholic
Archbishop of Zagreb from 1937 to 1960, was an active supporter of the
Ustashe regime and according to
<https://books.google.ca/books?id=qMZaPjrHqYYC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA284#v=onepage&q=
284&f=false>  prominent Balkan historian Bernd Jurgen Fischer "had close
association with the Ustashe leaders as the archbishop of the capital city,
had issued proclamations celebrating independent Croatia, and welcomed the
Ustashe leaders."

The European Union has yet to respond to any of the criticisms
<http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=06&dd=15&nav_id=98324
>  lodged against it for hosting an event dedicated to a key supporter of a
Nazi-backed regime that murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians
during the Second World War.

A recent definition (pictured below) of the Ustashe regime in the leading
German language dictionary 'Duden' as a "movement which fought against
'Serbian centralism'" has also provoked a firestorm of controversy and a
rapidly growing online petition
<http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-covering-up-nazi-ustasa-crimes-on-s
erbs-jews/>  sponsored by the humanitarian organization 28 Jun.
<https://www.28jun.org/>  (Full disclosure: we are both members of this
organization.) The definition makes no reference to any of the Ustashe's
well-documented and numerous crimes against civilian populations, giving it
the appearance of a legitimate political movement with reasonable aims.
These recent events are contributing to the growing sentiment among many
Serbs who feel alienated by the European Union, and as if a double standard
is being applied with regards to Serbia.

[image]


Loss of Credibility


Since Serbia attained candidate status in 2011, the European Union has
imposed on it a host of requirements and stipulations that ostensibly deal
with human rights and unresolved issues stemming from the Yugoslav Conflicts
of the 1990's. The Serbian government has largely complied with the
conditions imposed on it by the European Union and has committed itself to
the EU through acts such as extraditing members of its own government and
"normalizing" relations with the Republic of Kosovo (a self-declared state
which unilaterally declared independence from Serbia in 2008) at the behest
of the European Union. Additionally, many EU states voted in favor
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/serbia/11694089/British-UN
-resolution-on-Srebrenica-massacre-could-destabilise-the-region.html>  of a
failed UN resolution that sought to classify the controversial events in
Srebrenica in 1995 as "genocide".

Given the fact that the European Union has both passively supported the
rising tide of extremist political inclinations in one of its member states
by refusing to condemn it and actively supported it by hosting exhibitions
in its honor, Serbs' enthusiasm for joining the EU will likely continue
<http://www.voanews.com/content/brexit-dampens-zeal-for-serbias-eu-bid/34075
52.html>  to wane. The European Union has demonstrated a lack of integrity
and even-handedness in upholding its stated human rights values by enforcing
relatively harsh standards for Serbia while imposing virtually none on
Croatia, even going as far as openly supporting some of Croatia's worst
historical human rights abusers. Coupled with growing Eurosceptic sentiments
in both Serbia and Europe as a whole, the European Union's quiet support of
radicalized politics in Croatia could jeopardize the EU's strategic goals of
acquiring Serbia as a member.

Furthermore, the double standard shown by the European Union in its dealings
with Croatia and Serbia represent yet another example of the moral hypocrisy
of the European Union. While top EU officials were quick to denounce
legitimate populist movements such as the Brexit campaign as racist and
xenophobic, those same officials and institutions have done nothing but
tacitly support genuinely extremist politics in Croatia. Eurosceptic parties
such as Front Nationale and the Austrian Freedom Party are routinely branded
as "far right" and "radical" while political extremism in Croatia is allowed
to flourish. If the European Union does not take steps to meaningfully
combat this moral hypocrisy, then it is likely that the trend of increasing
skepticism towards the Union will continue to rise unabated. 

  Brexit <http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/tag/brexit/> , Croatia
<http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/tag/croatia/> , EU
<http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/tag/eu/> , Serbia
<http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/tag/serbia/> 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"serbia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/serbia.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to