rt.com <https://www.rt.com/news/392126-serbia-lawsuit-nato-depleted-uranium/>  


‘Up to 15 tons of depleted uranium used in 1999 Serbia bombing’ – lead lawyer 
in suit against NATO — RT News


4-5 minutes

  _____  

An international legal team is preparing a lawsuit against NATO over the 
alliance’s alleged use of depleted uranium munitions during its bombing of 
Yugoslavia. These have allegedly caused a rise in cancer-related illnesses 
across the region over the years. 

"The NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999 used between 10 and 15 tons of depleted 
uranium, which caused a major environmental disaster," said Srdjan Aleksic, a 
Serbian lawyer who leads the legal team, which includes lawyers from the EU, 
Russia, China and India. The legal team was formed 
<http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbian-royal-academy-to-file-charges-against-nato-05-11-2017>
  by the Serbian Royal Academy of Scientists and Artists.

"In Serbia, 33,000 people fall sick because of this every year. That is one 
child every day," he claimed.

NATO's press office says it's now aware of Serbia's allegations, but gave no 
further comment.

Read more

When asked as of why Serbia has decided to sue NATO 19 years after the attacks, 
the lawyer said "considering the horrific consequences for our population... it 
is never too late to sue someone who has caused an environmental catastrophe, 
someone [who] bombed Serbia with a quasi-nuclear weapon, i.e. depleted uranium."

The Serbian lawyer says 19 countries that were part of NATO at the time need to 
pay compensation for "for the financial and non-financial damages... to all the 
citizens who died or fell sick as a proven result of the NATO bombing."

"We expect the members of NATO to provide treatment to our citizens who are 
suffering from cancer," Aleksic said, adding that the bloc "must also provide 
the necessary technology and equipment to remove all traces of the depleted 
uranium" from Serbia.

"The use of banned weapons" by the US-led military alliance in the Balkans "was 
a violation of all the international conventions and rules that protect people" 
from such kind of weapons, the lawyer claimed, adding that NATO also used 
depleted uranium in Iraq in 1991.

"The alliance has not been put on trial for this act, but the consequences are 
disastrous," he said.

In its 2000 report on depleted uranium, NATO confirmed the use of the munitions 
both in Iraq and in the Balkans. 

"In Iraq, about 300 metric tons of DU [depleted uranium] ammunition were fired 
by American and British troops. Recently, NATO confirmed the use of DU 
ammunition in Kosovo battlefields, where approximately 10 metric tons of DU 
were used," the report <http://www.nato.int/du/docu/d000500e.htm>  says.

Read more

 

The UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has also 
admitted 
<http://www.icty.org/en/press/final-report-prosecutor-committee-established-review-nato-bombing-campaign-against-federal#IVA2>
 "there is evidence of use of depleted uranium (DU) projectiles by NATO 
aircraft during the bombing campaign." However, the UN tribunal has pointed out 
that "there is no specific treaty ban on the use of DU projectiles."

Reporting on the consequences of the use of such munitions for civil population 
and the environment, a NATO report said 
<http://www.nato.int/du/docu/d000500e.htm>  that "in the vicinity of the impact 
point of DU ammunitions, it is not excluded that individuals unaware of the 
contamination... could have accumulated radiation doses and/or could have 
incorporated uranium quantities exceeding the internationally recognized 
limits."

In May, Balkan Insight reported 
<http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbian-royal-academy-to-file-charges-against-nato-05-11-2017>
  that around 50 people from the Serbian city of Nis, who have been suffering 
from cancer and have "seemingly relevant medical documentation" have asked the 
legal team of 26 lawyers and professors to represent them in the case against 
NATO.

NATO launched airstrikes in what was then Yugoslavia in March 1999, without the 
backing of the UN Security Council, after it accused Belgrade of “excessive and 
disproportionate use of force in Kosovo” in a conflict with insurgent Muslim 
ethnic Albanians.

With no UN mandate, NATO bombing of Serbia lasted for three months, having 
resulted in hundreds of civilian deaths.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"serbia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/serbia.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to