theconversation.com 
<http://theconversation.com/britains-role-in-the-balkans-why-boris-johnson-is-about-to-turn-pro-eu-93408>
  


Britain’s role in the Balkans – why Boris Johnson is about to turn pro-EU


Othon Anastasakis

5-7 minutes

  _____  

Here’s a paradox from Brexit Britain. This summer, at a summit meeting in 
London organised by the UK’s Foreign Office, a hard Brexiteer – the foreign 
secretary Boris Johnson – will be the designated advocate of EU membership for 
the Western Balkan states. A country preparing to leave the EU will preach the 
accession of Bosnia-Herzegovina 
<https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/bosnia-10925> , Albania, FYR Macedonia, 
Serbia, Kosovo, and Montenegro to the European Union. A country seeking to 
“take back control” from the heavy-handedness of Brussels will advise others to 
relinquish their sovereignty to that same superstate. What’s going on here?

The London summit in July will host the leaders of the six Western Balkan 
states and those of Britain, Germany, Italy, France and Austria. It’s part of 
the so-called Berlin Process 
<https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=berlin+process+balkans&oq=berlin+process+balkans&aqs=chrome..69i57.4952j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>
 , an intergovernmental initiative introduced by Angela Merkel in 2014 whose 
goal was to help the development of the Western Balkans by focusing on 
investment, connectivity, infrastructure and regional cooperation, with the 
ultimate aim of their joining the EU 
<https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-eu-balkans/eu-opens-door-to-balkans-with-2025-target-for-membership-idUKKBN1FQ1X4>
 .

So far, as part of the process, a Regional Youth Cooperation Office 
<http://www.rycowb.org/>  has been established to “promote the spirit of 
reconciliation and cooperation between the youth in the region through youth 
exchange programmes”. An agreement 
<https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/policy-highlights/regional-cooperation/20150828_chairmans_conclusions_western_balkans_summit.pdf>
  has also been signed for the settlement of bilateral disputes. There is also 
talk of a Western Balkans Economic Area, where goods, services, investments and 
skilled workers would be able to move without obstacles. 

The Berlin Process includes, from the EU side, the five strongest and most 
prominent member states. Every summer, the leaders of these countries meet with 
the leaders from the six Western Balkan countries to reaffirm their commitment 
to the region’s European integration. They also aim to attract pledges for 
investment and take a family photo during a highly publicised summit.

Delegates arrive at the 2017 summit in Trieste. EPA 

Now, following a commitment made in 2014, it’s Britain’s turn to be the host of 
that summit. The 2018 meeting is an opportunity for the UK to show that it has 
something substantial to offer to European affairs despite Brexit. After all, 
every host so far has shaped the agenda by including their own expertise. In 
Vienna, three years ago it was civil society engagement, in Paris, two years 
ago, it was climate change. Last year’s summit in Trieste 
<https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/international/news/2017-07-12-western-balkans-summit-2017-delivering-region_en>
  dealt with the rule of law and the fight against corruption.


Delicate balance


Despite its imminent departure from the EU, Britain does still have a useful 
role to play in the Berlin Process. That might include its security expertise 
as a strong military nation that remains an enthusiastic member of NATO 
<https://theconversation.com/uk/topics/nato-786> . With geopolitics becoming 
increasingly significant for Europe’s foreign policy, the Western Balkans is 
one of the most vulnerable regions of the continent. From a security 
perspective, the region is highly exposed to risks on the periphery of Europe. 

The security risks in the region include a generic fear of return to the wars 
of the 1990s among some post-Yugoslav states, the threat of Islamic 
fundamentalism 
<https://theconversation.com/radicalisation-in-bosnia-old-wounds-reopened-by-an-emerging-problem-63534>
 , the rise of organised crime, geopolitical and geo-economic competition from 
China, Russia, or Turkey.

Then there are the existing bilateral disputes among post-Yugoslav states. All 
have unresolved border issues – some of them subject to international 
arbitration. And all these disputes affect stability. None of the states have 
threatened to use military force against each other to resolve these issues, 
but any security assistance from abroad to one country may be seen to 
antagonise the interests of the neighbouring country.

Focusing so heavily on the issue of security can also actually harm political 
progress. People in the region increasingly experience a backsliding of 
democracy. 

As a recent House of Lords report 
<https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldintrel/53/53.pdf>  
noted, there is “serious concern that gains made towards good governance and 
the rule of law are in danger of being lost as countries in the region turn to 
authoritarian leadership, nationalistic politics and state capture”. And a 
recent report 
<http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/balkan-countries-still-facing-old-human-rights-issues-01-18-2018>
  by Human Rights Watch found that most countries in the region still face 
serious challenges in upholding human rights standards.

Because the primary concern has, for so long, been security in the Western 
Balkans, such anxieties have, for the most part, fallen on deaf ears in Western 
capitals. Geopolitical concerns have allowed local leaders and governments to 
enjoy lax political conditionality for the sake of security and stability – 
what has been labelled “stabilitocracy”. As a result, liberal politics have 
deteriorated and advances made during the 2000s have eroded.

It’s important that any security agenda embraces democracy, human rights, and 
rule of law – the “holy trinity” of political transformation, which itself is a 
necessary condition for security and stability in the region. That should be 
the common goal of both the Berlin Process and the European Commission, the 
latter having recently adopted a new enlargement strategy 
<https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-credible-enlargement-perspective-western-balkans_en.pdf>
  for the Western Balkan candidate states. The biggest challenge for Johnson 
and the Foreign Office, on this particular occasion, is to find ways to 
cooperate effectively with the European Union, aiming at the inclusion of the 
Western Balkan countries in the European family, at a time when the UK is 
excluding itself from it.

 

Reply via email to