http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bissett-if-you-accept-the-refugees-they-will-keep-coming

Bissett: If you accept the refugees, they will keep coming 
<http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bissett-if-you-accept-the-refugees-they-will-keep-coming>
 


 


 

 
<http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bissett-if-you-accept-the-refugees-they-will-keep-coming>
 

 

 

 

 

 


 
<http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bissett-if-you-accept-the-refugees-they-will-keep-coming>
 Bissett: If you accept the refugees, they will keep comi...

By James Bissett If you take them, they will come. This reality explains the 
uneasy truth about mass migratory and refugee movements. What might be see...

        


 
<http://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bissett-if-you-accept-the-refugees-they-will-keep-coming>
 View on calgaryherald.com

Preview by Yahoo

        


 

                                                                

CALGARY HERALD, Published October 3, 2015

By James Bissett

If you take them, they will come. This reality explains the uneasy truth about 
mass migratory and refugee movements. What might be seen at first as a 
humanitarian gesture to help resolve a refugee crisis, often mutates into an 
uncontrolled and unmanageable migratory flow of people seeking a better life — 
and if you keep taking them, they will keep coming.

This is not a new revelation and it explains why the United States, after 
initially welcoming thousands of Cubans and Haitians as refugees in the 1970s 
and 1980s, realized the flow had to be stopped, and did so by interdicting 
ships carrying the refugees and sending them back to their homelands.

For a number of years now, Australia, after receiving large numbers of asylum 
seekers, has essentially stopped the flow by intercepting ships and preventing 
their cargo from landing.

In 1986, there were more refugees leaving Vietnam than there had been in the 
immediate years following the fall of Saigon in 1975. The large numbers had 
created an international crisis and serious backlash in the countries of first 
asylum. In 1989, under the auspices of the United Nations, it was decided to 
stop the flow and send back those who were unable to meet the UN convention 
definition of refugee. This repatriation program effectively ended the movement.

The practice of resettling refugees in countries enjoying a high standard of 
living has proven to lead to more arrivals, to encourage human trafficking, and 
to result in unacceptable high costs and potential hostility toward the 
newcomers. It was for these reasons that the United Nations High Commissioner 
for Refugees (UNHCR) has accepted that third country resettlement is not the 
preferred solution to a refugee crisis. Prevention, containment and local 
resettlement are the favoured options.

There are other reasons why providing protection in the first country of asylum 
is the first option, and why it is assumed that refugees fleeing persecution 
should seek protection in the first safe country entered. Offering protection 
and care in a neighbouring country makes it easier and faster for the refugees 
to return home when stability is returned to their own country. However, the 
primary reason is that the costs are dramatically lower than resettlement in a 
more distant country.

It takes between $25,000 and $40,000 to settle a refugee in a third country, 
whereas the costs of protecting and caring for a refugee in a camp are a 
fraction of that amount. Accepting 10,000 government refugees will cost Canada 
close to $300 million. Obviously, this amount would be much more effectively 
used by donating it to the UNHCR to help that agency care for the 60 million 
people under its jurisdiction; our contribution so far this year to the UNHCR’s 
annual budget has been a minimal $64 million.

We should also be aware that the vast majority of the people now flowing into 
Europe had already found protection in Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon or Egypt. Their 
onward journey to reach Germany or Sweden is not to find protection from 
persecution or violence, but to enjoy a better standard of living. This is not 
to condemn these unfortunate victims of a brutal civil war, but to be aware 
that a mass migration of this kind can quickly get out of control and create 
chaos and instability in the receiving countries.

 The current flow of many thousands of refugees from the violence in the Middle 
East and from hunger and famine in Africa, is surely only the beginning of a 
massive population shift from the poor countries of the world to the more 
prosperous nations of the West. In the long term, it may prove to be impossible 
to stop this population transformation, but a quick end must be found to end 
the current crisis, and this cannot be done by allowing people to cross 
international borders with impunity and demand to have passage to their country 
of choice.

Territorial integrity and the sovereignty of borders have been the twin 
principles of international law since the treaty of Westphalia in 1648. They 
are enshrined in the United Nations charter and have framed the very framework 
of our global security system. The current mass influx of close to a million 
migrants into the European Union so far this year poses a direct threat to 
these principles, and if not curtailed and managed, threatens the very basis of 
western civilization.

 Although this is an immediate problem for Europe, it needs an international 
effort under the auspices of the UNHCR to resolve it. The staff and budget of 
the UNHCR must be urgently supplemented. The countries of first asylum must be 
provided with the financial means of protecting and caring for refugees and 
humanitarian cases.

People arriving by sea should be intercepted and safely escorted back to where 
they came from. Refugees who are in a safe country should be prevented from 
attempting to cross borders without proper documentation. These measures have 
proven successful in the past in dealing with refugee crises and in managing 
mass migrations of people. However, the first step is to stop the flow — 
because if you take them, they will come, and if you keep taking them, they 
will keep coming.

James Bissett is a former Canadian ambassador and head of the Canadian 
Immigration Service from 1985 to 1990.



Reply via email to