America Created Al-Qaeda and the ISIS Terror Group


By  <http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/garikai-chengu> Garikai Chengu Global 
Research 19 September 2014  
http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-created-al-qaeda-and-the-isis-terror-group/5402881

Much like Al Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS) is made-in-the-USA, an instrument 
of terror designed to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to 
counter Iran’s growing influence in the region.

The fact that the United States has a long and torrid history of backing 
terrorist groups will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore history.

The CIA first aligned itself with extremist Islam during the Cold War era. Back 
then, America saw the world in rather simple terms: on one side, the Soviet 
Union and Third World nationalism, which America regarded as a Soviet tool; on 
the other side, Western nations and militant political Islam, which America 
considered an ally in the struggle against the Soviet Union.

The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, General 
William Odom recently remarked, “by any measure the U.S. has long used 
terrorism. In 1978-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international 
terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the U.S. would be 
in violation.”

During the 1970′s the CIA used the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as a barrier, 
both to thwart Soviet expansion and prevent the spread of Marxist ideology 
among the Arab masses. The United States also openly supported Sarekat Islam 
against Sukarno in Indonesia, and supported the Jamaat-e-Islami terror group 
against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in Pakistan. Last but certainly not least, there is 
Al Qaeda.

Lest we forget, the CIA gave birth to Osama Bin Laden and breastfed his 
organization during the 1980′s. Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, 
told the House of Commons that Al Qaeda was unquestionably a product of Western 
intelligence agencies. Mr. Cook explained that Al Qaeda, which literally means 
an abbreviation of “the database” in Arabic, was originally the computer 
database of the thousands of Islamist extremists, who were trained by the CIA 
and funded by the Saudis, in order to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan.

America’s relationship with Al Qaeda has always been a love-hate affair. 
Depending on whether a particular Al Qaeda terrorist group in a given region 
furthers American interests or not, the U.S. State Department either funds or 
aggressively targets that terrorist group. Even as American foreign policy 
makers claim to oppose Muslim extremism, they knowingly foment it as a weapon 
of foreign policy.

The Islamic State is its latest weapon that, much like Al Qaeda, is certainly 
backfiring. ISIS recently rose to international prominence after its thugs 
began beheading American journalists. Now the terrorist group controls an area 
the size of the United Kingdom.

In order to understand why the Islamic State has grown and flourished so 
quickly, one has to take a look at the organization’s American-backed roots. 
The 2003 American invasion and occupation of Iraq created the pre-conditions 
for radical Sunni groups, like ISIS, to take root. America, rather unwisely, 
destroyed Saddam Hussein’s secular state machinery and replaced it with a 
predominantly Shiite administration. The U.S. occupation caused vast 
unemployment in Sunni areas, by rejecting socialism and closing down factories 
in the naive hope that the magical hand of the free market would create jobs. 
Under the new U.S.-backed Shiite regime, working class Sunni’s lost hundreds of 
thousands of jobs. Unlike the white Afrikaners in South Africa, who were 
allowed to keep their wealth after regime change, upper class Sunni’s were 
systematically dispossessed of their assets and lost their political influence. 
Rather than promoting religious integration and unity, American policy in Iraq 
exacerbated sectarian divisions and created a fertile breading ground for Sunni 
discontent, from which Al Qaeda in Iraq took root.

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used to have a different name: Al 
Qaeda in Iraq. After 2010 the group rebranded and refocused its efforts on 
Syria.

There are essentially three wars being waged in Syria: one between the 
government and the rebels, another between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and yet 
another between America and Russia. It is this third, neo-Cold War battle that 
made U.S. foreign policy makers decide to take the risk of arming Islamist 
rebels in Syria, because Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, is a key Russian 
ally. Rather embarrassingly, many of these Syrian rebels have now turned out to 
be ISIS thugs, who are openly brandishing American-made M16 Assault rifles.

America’s Middle East policy revolves around oil and Israel. The invasion of 
Iraq has partially satisfied Washington’s thirst for oil, but ongoing air 
strikes in Syria and economic sanctions on Iran have everything to do with 
Israel. The goal is to deprive Israel’s neighboring enemies, Lebanon’s 
Hezbollah and Palestine’s Hamas, of crucial Syrian and Iranian support.

ISIS is not merely an instrument of terror used by America to topple the Syrian 
government; it is also used to put pressure on Iran.

The last time Iran invaded another nation was in 1738. Since independence in 
1776, the U.S. has been engaged in over 53 military invasions and expeditions. 
Despite what the Western media’s war cries would have you believe, Iran is 
clearly not the threat to regional security, Washington is. An Intelligence 
Report published in 2012, endorsed by all sixteen U.S. intelligence agencies, 
confirms that Iran ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Truth is, any 
Iranian nuclear ambition, real or imagined, is as a result of American 
hostility towards Iran, and not the other way around.

America is using ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, 
to serve as a pretext for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to 
foment a manufactured domestic threat, used to justify the unprecedented 
expansion of invasive domestic surveillance.

By rapidly increasing both government secrecy and surveillance, Mr. Obama’s 
government is increasing its power to watch its citizens, while diminishing its 
citizens’ power to watch their government. Terrorism is an excuse to justify 
mass surveillance, in preparation for mass revolt.

The so-called “War on Terror” should be seen for what it really is: a pretext 
for maintaining a dangerously oversized U.S. military. The two most powerful 
groups in the U.S. foreign policy establishment are the Israel lobby, which 
directs U.S. Middle East policy, and the Military-Industrial-Complex, which 
profits from the former group’s actions. Since George W. Bush declared the “War 
on Terror” in October 2001, it has cost the American taxpayer approximately 6.6 
trillion dollars and thousands of fallen sons and daughters; but, the wars have 
also raked in billions of dollars for Washington’s military elite.

In fact, more than seventy American companies and individuals have won up to 
$27 billion in contracts for work in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan over the last 
three years, according to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity. 
According to the study, nearly 75 per cent of these private companies had 
employees or board members, who either served in, or had close ties to, the 
executive branch of the Republican and Democratic administrations, members of 
Congress, or the highest levels of the military.

In 1997, a U.S. Department of Defense report stated, “the data show a strong 
correlation between U.S. involvement abroad and an increase in terrorist 
attacks against the U.S.” Truth is, the only way America can win the “War On 
Terror” is if it stops giving terrorists the motivation and the resources to 
attack America. Terrorism is the symptom; American imperialism in the Middle 
East is the cancer. Put simply, the War on Terror is terrorism; only, it is 
conducted on a much larger scale by people with jets and missiles.

Garikai Chengu is a research scholar at Harvard University. Contact him on  
<mailto:garikai.che...@gmail.com> garikai.che...@gmail.com

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright ©  <http://www.globalresearch.ca/author/garikai-chengu> Garikai 
Chengu, Global Research, 2015

Reply via email to