Good morning Alfred, I just began to be a bit uncertain if all of your patches against oob.cf have been applied. Somehow it seems to me that I have forgotten one but can't find it really. Could you doublecheck for me?
-jiri Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > Anonymous (JIRA) wrote: >> Minor cleanup in ser-oob.cfg >> ---------------------------- >> >> Key: SER-370 >> URL: http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-370 >> Project: SER >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: Unspecified >> Affects Versions: 2.0 >> Priority: Trivial >> >> >> This patch fixes some small iseus in etc/ser-oob.cfg >> > > Hi, I just posted a small patch (again) against SER OOB config for SER v2.0. > > > Is it really so that the default SER Out-Of-the-Box (OOB) config is not > working out-of-the-box? I tried SER v2.0 from CVS HEAD with the default > config and got: > > > # /usr/local/sbin/ser -cf ser-oob.cfg > 0(15694) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_skip_delete> not found in > module <usrloc> > 0(15694) parse error (278,19-20): Can't set module parameter > ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) > > > if you grep for the symbol "db_skip_delete" in SER v2.0 source tree: > > > $ grep -nrI db_skip_delete . > ./etc/ser-oob.cfg:278:#modparam("usrloc", "db_skip_delete", 1) > > > does anyone know where this is defined ? > > > /alfred > _______________________________________________ > Serdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev > _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
