> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 October 2001 12:24
> I've been using "serf_" for the prefix in my examples. Sander used "aps_"
> when we were chatting.
Yes, but I hadn't seen serf_ then yet :)
So, +1 for serf_
> The prefix is Yet Another Discussion Item. :-)
>
> Suggestions? Preferences?
>
>
> I like serf_ because it makes it clear what library you're talking about.
> Detractors of apr-serf might say it just points to the non-relationship to
> APR :-) I'm not so concerned about the latter as utility/obviousness to
> users.
>
> This prefix also ties in with header naming, library names, etc. ("serf.h"
> and "serf_basic.h"; libserf.la; etc)
Ack.
> Cheers,
> -g
Sander
