Steve, Mostly oversight. I haven't done anything with FetchPOP/Fetchmail, and was hoping that Danny would have time to look them over, since they've been his baby to date.
I still have them in my inbox, and they are also archived here: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] .org&msgNo=8877 http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] .org&msgNo=8881 --- Noel -----Original Message----- From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:34 To: 'James Developers List' Subject: RE: cvs commit: james-server/www/javadocs/org/apache/james/fetchmail FetchMail.html FetchScheduler.html ReaderInputStream.html package-frame.html package-summary.html package-tree.html package-use.html > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 August 2003 16:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: > james-server/www/javadocs/org/apache/james/fetchmail FetchMail.html > FetchScheduler.html ReaderInputStream.html package-frame.html > package-summary.html package-tree.html package-use.html Which reminds me. Back in June I submitted a pretty major patch to fetchmail that fixed a few problems and added a number of processing options. This doesn't seem to have made it into the CVS. This may be because the committers have yet to have a chance to look at it, it has been intentionally passed over in favour of the current implementation (fair enough), or it has simply been missed in the avalanche of work that the committers get through. Absolutely no criticism intended which ever scenario applies, I'm justing wondering what the status is. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
