I'd suggest that its up to you, Both are proposals, meaning that it would take a vote of comitters to move iether back into james' tree, and consequently into releases.
Therefore logic says you are entitled to work on either, I suspect, but can't remember, that IMAP2 is newer and has been patched more often and more recently. d. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 September 2003 10:50 > To: 'James Developers List' > Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers > > > I hate to use discussion forum techniques on a mail list... > *bump* :) > > I'm still not sure which IMAP implementation to use > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 08 September 2003 09:32 > > To: 'James Developers List' > > Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers > > > > > > I'm slighty confused here. > > Which is the correct IMAP proposal to use? > > The IMAP one or IMAP2? > > Both appear to be IMAP4v1 capable servers, but IMAP2 seems to > > be more complete > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
