The goal is not to distribute a derivative copy, per-se, but to allow different implementations of the internals. There is no intention to provide a sar, but once one has a sar, jars can be dropped in and the xml config files updated to use the different implementations.
I guess basically I'm asking: Is it ok to use the James name outside of the org.apache namespace? Thanks, - Phillip --- Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you could give a bit more background so we can > help "guide" you there. > > If you want to distribute a derivative copy of > James, then you cannot > call it James. As for reworking the code, putting > James code here and > there, a maildir implementation, whatever else... > all that's just fine > and great. In fact some of those might be > interesting patches as others > could be interested. > > Anyway, again nothing you've described is wrong. > But where are you > trying to go and what are you asking of us? > > -- > Serge Knystautas > President > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> > http://www.lokitech.com > p. 301.656.5501 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phillip Smith wrote: > > This is my first post to this list so if it�s in > the > > wrong place, please advise. > > > > I have re-implemented > > org.apache.james.smtpserver.SMTPHandler to > separate > > the parsing of the stream from the handling of its > > contents and to be configured for either blocking > or > > non-blocking mode. I intend to do the same for > the > > org.apache.james.pop3server.POP3Handler and IMAP. > It > > has been recently decided to add a MailRepository > for > > a modified MailDir format. I know the James is > built > > on the Phoenix (Avalon), and allows its components > to > > be pluggable � but at want point does it stop > being > > James, if it stops at all? I still intend to use > the > > Mailet functionality, the incoming spooling, and > the > > remote forwarding capabilities. I�ve put > non-James > > classes (generic parsing) in my package namespace > > (<toplevel-domain>.protocol.smtp, etc). I�ve put > > James classes in (<toplevel-domain>.james., etc). > Is > > this appropriate? I don�t want to call it James > if it > > isn�t, and vise versa. > > > > Suggestions, advice, guidance requested > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
