> > I found that many of them are throwing MessagingException-s > > instead of MailetException-s (including my own code ;-). > > You know ... I could have sworn I had raised this exact question > earlier in > the year. I've no clue as to why there are both. > > How could we make better use MailetException, just as > SendFailedException is > a specialized type of MessagingException? Right now it is just a synonym > for MessagingException. > > Can you see any reason why the container would want to catch a > MailetException and not catch a MessagingException? Can you see > any reason > why the container would want to handle them differently? Do we want to > Matchers and Mailets to throw MailetException so that we can distinguish > between one that they threw, and one that was leaked? > The latter makes sense for me...
Vincenzo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
