I believe OpenJMS is compatible in binary form, but source suffers from the Intalio indemnity problem.
JORAM was (is?) LGPL, but ObjectWeb have started to switch their projects to an ASF-friendly license (ASM just switched to BSD for example). -- Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:07 PM > To: James Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Status of JMS > > > Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > James Strachan wrote: > > > I'd use OpenJMS or JGroups for now. There is no JMS implementation > > > inside Geronimo yet & I can't imagine there would be one for a while. > > > The intention is to integrate an existing JMS implementation > using JCA now > > that we have transaction and security inflow. I believe OpenJMS > is working > > on that; JORAM would be another possibility. > > Are the licenses for both of those compatible? > > --- Noel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
