James Bucanek wrote: > So I'll take a look at the what I might need to do to > build.xml to get James to build locally (simply because I'm > mostly just going to be messing around with it on my > workstation for awhile). Eventually I'll probably adopt > Steve's workflow for building/running/testing on my server.
You should not need to change build.xml and if you do it will be out of sync. with what is maintained as part of the distribution. You should be able to get it to run inside Eclipse without any changes by ensuring that the environment provided by Eclipse is the same as that established by the build scripts. > I think what I'd like to do next is to set up a project that > builds a Mailet or three. One reason I wanted to get > up-to-speed on James 3.0 is because I wanted to take > advantage of the new Mailet deployment, which I hear is much > better than what was in 2.1. This is also available in v2.2.0, CVS branch 'branch_2_1_fcs'. From the CVS Perspective use 'Configure Branches and Versions...' to reveal the relevant branches. > Where would I start to find out how Mailets are packaged and > deployed in 3.0? Package them into a .jar and place them in the /apps/james/SAR-INF/lib directory of the distribution. Add your package names to the <mailetpackages> and <matcherpackages> declarations in /apps/james/SAR-INF/config.xml of the distribution. -- Steve - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This private and confidential e-mail has been sent to you by Synergy Systems Limited. It may not represent the views of Synergy Systems Limited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please notify the sender by replying with "received in error" as the subject and then delete it from your mailbox. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]