The code of James, as I have come to know it, follows the directions about dot stuffing and dot stripping, in RFC 2821 section 4.5.2 and RFC 1939 section 3 paragraph 4. I believe it is correct.

But, perhaps because my mind froze up decades ago when computer cycles mattered, I notice that everything going through my server (an offshoot of James) gets dot-stripped when it comes in through SMTP, and dot-stuffed again when it goes out through SMTP or POP3 -- BUT I NEVER USE IT IN THE DOT-STRIPPED CONDITION. Why don't I just skip the stuffing and stripping entirely?

Now I will need to keep dot-stuffing functionality around, at least for use upon my own locally generated messages. But it looks to me like simplification and optimization are possible here, by confining dot-stuffing and dot-stripping to those cases where it is ultimately necessary.

My questions: Do you agree with this idea? Have you seen it discussed before?

Thanks,
Rich Hammer


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to