Don't ask me how, but you just reminded me to comment in james-config.xml that the <authorizedAddresses> element in SMTP is likely to be replaced if/when we have the enhanced SMTPACL changes in place.
Serge wrote that he agreed with the list. I am hoping that Serge read the SMTPACL submission. There have been quite a few proposals for generalized protocol-time filtering, including two from me, but Alex's approach is much more elegant in administration and code re-use than any prior proposal. Now I want to return the favor, and generalize Alex's approach. That would give James unquestionably the most flexible and consistent approach to message filtering. I'm quite excited about the potential and possibilities.
No I haven't read it. When roughly was it posted?
-- Serge Knystautas President Lokitech >>> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
