> > Why MailmanBridge?  Seems to be generic, so why not
> "PipedProcess" or some such?

> Because I was planning to add functionality that was specific to
> Mailman, to simplify the configuration of large numbers of lists

Ah.  Might make sense to factor it out into a base class with a protected
method for acquiring the command line to be processed.

As for your configuration change, I think you're going about it wrong.  Take
a look at the new mailing list manager in branch_2_1_fcs, and see how it
uses an external XML file, and pattern substitution.

        --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to