Noel, Looking at the code, I think that you're right, but ... why did we do it that way at the time? So many months have passed, so it's difficult to remember.
Let's think on it for a few days, and if next monday nothing against it arises I'll do, test and commit the small code change. Vincenzo > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: giovedi 8 aprile 2004 0.30 > To: James-Dev Mailing List > Subject: AbstractRedirect w/ passThrough = false > > > In AbstractRedirect, we have (casts removed): > > newMail = originalMail.duplicate(newName(originalMail)); > > Seems to me that if passThrough is false, we can use the same name, and not > create a new one. Anyone disagree? Vincenzo, your thoughts? > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
