Serge Knystautas wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > The whole package is about 50K of code. We should probably > import this > > through the Incubator as a pass-through for James. I'm not > sure if it would > > be best to add it as org.apache.james.util.mime, and > perhaps eventually > > migrate to Jakarta Commons, or to include it within the Mailet API. > > Why in Jakarta commons instead of James?
I would favour a similar approach to jSieve and make it a sub-project of James. James itself can make use of the sub-project once the required levels of functionality and performance are achieved. This would suggest a package name of 'org.apache.xxx', where 'xxx' is a suitable (sub)project name. I would rather avoid 'mime' as it is too broad and more indicative of mime extensions than a project, at least in my mind. If required, such a sub-project could be spun off to Jakarta Commons at a later stage. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
