> > By the way, if anyone wonders about Processors and Mailets,
> > and why it is often confusing in some cases as to why they
> > are different, look at the old code. A processor was
> > nothing more than a specialized mailet. :-) So it
> > shouldn't be surprising at all, in retrospect.
> What is confusing is why Processors are not still instances of
> Mailet .. why did we remove the flexibility that that would
> have offered, namely the ability to nest certain Mailets?
I don't know. Serge would be the best person to answer. I can only go by
the code and CVS comments (the archives only go back to 2001), so it is an
rather an exercise in software archaeology.
But I agree with you in principle, which is why I pointed out the history.
It was particularly coincidental in timing, with my work on refactoring the
self-spooling behavior used in RemoteDelivery. Would you be willing to
revisit the issue for v3?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
